Nepotism rocks? Saif Ali Khan and Kangana Ranaut disagree but at least have a civil debate Skip to main content

Nepotism rocks? Saif Ali Khan and Kangana Ranaut disagree but at least have a civil debate

Nepotism rocks? Saif Ali Khan and Kangana Ranaut disagree but at least have a civil debate


The couch on Koffee with Karan has the gift of creating controversy. So when the Queen and the Nawab sat their svelte selves on it, it was a foregone conclusion that sparks would fly. What was a surprise was the direction in which they flew – towards the show’s host. With a killer smile on her face Kangana Ranaut lay into Karan Johar for being the stereotypical Bollywood biggie, intolerant to outsiders, flag bearer of nepotism. Months on, the fire got restoked at an awards show where Saif Ali Khan, Varun Dhawan and Karan joked – perhaps a tad uneasily – about being there because of their mummy or papa. Now both the Queen and the Nawab have written on nepotism – in more than 140 characters.
Their essays are a well-lettered reminder of the art of debate, where differences of opinion are addressed by presenting one’s case rationally, not trolling or flaming or cyberbullying. Saif makes the intriguing claim that if he got a break because of his mother, it was less nepotism and more genetics. To which Kangana’s dramatic rebuttal is that if it all came down to genetic inheritance, she would be a farmer back in Himachal Pradesh.
Saif also claims that nepotism in the movie industry is far less rampant than in politics and business. And this nepotism is ultimately tempered by democracy, or people power (although folks in politics or business would argue the same). That’s how guys and girls like SRK and Sridevi from non-filmi backgrounds rise to the top, while many star kids bite the dust. In this Saif may be right. But in still refusing to make peace with nepotism Kangana is pursuing a fairer world. Without this gutsy chasing of aspirations, she would not be Queen today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rising Hindu nationalism has hijacked India's China policy: Chinese media Rising Hindu nationalism has hijacked Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s China policy and could lead  the two countries to war, Chinese state media said on Thursday, adding a warning that it could put India’s own interests in “jeopardy”. The latest salvo from Chinese state media -- in the backdrop of an ongoing military impasse near the Sikkim border -- reminded New Delhi that it is “weaker” than China in “national strength” but Indian politicians have failed to grasp that reality. Sounding a warning, the commentary also reminded the Modi government about its failure to curb Hindu nationalistic violence against Muslims since this government came to power in 2014. The state media article indicated the current standoff was planned and executed to cater to Hindu nationalistic sentiments. Modi rode a wave of rising religious nationalism to power in 2014 and is now pandering to the sentiments through its...
Jethmalani quits as kejriwal's counsel , demands 2 crore inr as fee Not only has Ram Jethmalani quit as Arvind Kejriwal's lawyer, the senior Supreme Court lawyer has asked the Delhi Chief Minister to  settle  his legal fee of over ₹2 crore. Jethmalani was representing Kejriwal in civil and criminal defamation cases brought against him and five other leaders of the Aam Aadmi Party by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister sued the Delhi chief minister after he accused the former of corruption during his term as head of the Delhi & District Cricket Association (DDCA). Jethmalani quit on Tuesday after claiming that Kejriwal had instructed him to use derogatory language against Jaitley in court, and accusing the chief minister of using even worse language against the finance minister in private discussions,  The Times of India   reported  today. The reason for the fallout goes back to legal proceedings in the Delhi High Court on May 1...
No pardons please: Disposing mercy petitions has been President Mukherjee’s foremost legacy In a recent interview, when asked what his legacy would be, President Pranab Mukherjee quoted Prospero from The Tempest and said that he would “leave not a rack behind”. His record in dealing with mercy petitions from convicts makes good his claim. Contrary to many of his predecessors Mukherjee disposed of 34 petitions, rejecting 30 of them and leaving none pending for his successor. Ironically, by literally leaving nothing behind, he leaves a clear legacy for future presidents to follow – reject mercy petitions in principle as an anachronism that has no place in the Constitution of a democratic republic. The power of pardon, a prerogative power exercised by the sovereign of England, has been described as “the brightest jewel in the British crown, and the most precious of the rights of the people”. Representing the fiction that the sovereign was the embodiment of divinity, the power ext...